Ants in the Devil’s Garden

lemonantScientists are still making novel discoveries in the Amazon jungle. There’s still plenty to learn, even about ants. Two species of ant discovered recently have evolved in intriguing ways. The first species is interesting for its horticultural practises.

There are areas in Amazonia where almost nothing grows except one species of tree, Duroia hirsuta. It’s much shorter than surrounding trees, being only a few meters tall. These strange patches, as much as a few hundred meters wide, look like orchards. They look as if someone has cleared the forest and planted this one type of tree.

devilsgarden2The local people know they didn’t do it and they didn’t see anyone else do it. The effect is apparently so spooky that local legends call the sites devil’s gardens, attributing their existence to an evil spirit. It’s not evil spirits, though, but ants that are responsible for the devil’s gardens. A species of ant called Myrmelaschista schumanni lives in the hollow stems of the D. hirsuta trees and they destroy all the competition. They rely on their host trees for shelter and food and they take extreme measures to protect them.

Their strategy is very successful. Some of the oldest gardens are calculated to be over 800 years old. The millions of worker ants kill the unwanted plants by injecting formic acid into their leaves. The researchers showed it was the ants by planting other species of trees and then protecting some and not others. The unprotected ones started to die within a day while the protected ones survived. This quashed the competing hypothesis which held that the D. hirsuta was inhibiting the growth of other plants by releasing chemicals.

The other ant species (Cephalotes atratus) is interesting because of its gliding ability, even though it doesn’t have wings.

The research in this case was on mosquitoes and the researchers were thirty meters up in the forest canopy waiting to get bitten. Ants, going about their normal business, encountered the humans and naturally attacked to protect their territory. When they were brushed off, instead of just falling they were seen to glide back to the tree trunk. They might bounce off once but they would glide back in again and most of the ants would get back safely to the tree. The researchers concluded that the ants were using their flared heads to glide.

gliding-antAnts join the list of species capable of wingless flight. Like flying squirrels, lizards, frogs and snakes, these ants have evolved the ability to maneuver in the air even without wings.

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Apostrophe

Credit Graham Horn - CC-BY-SA

Credit Graham Horn – CC-BY-SA

Grammar of the Day – Apostrophe

note: Dana Sallow kindly recommended another grammar website that they found both amusing and useful to them as a non-native English speaker. (See their comment below) The issue covered in this post from a Website Planet blog by Joshua Bromley is homophones. That is, words that sound alike but have different meanings.

Okay, so it’s really punctuation. I’m using it anyway.

The way the apostrophe is being used today has me nervous, afraid this sentence might turn out like this: The way the apostrophe i’s being used today ha’s me nervou’s, afraid thi’s sentence might turn out like thi’s. Sometimes it seems as if people just throw one in if the word ends in an ‘s.’

Credit Dirk Ingo Franke - CC-BY

Credit Dirk Ingo Franke – CC-BY

Granted that’s a bit extreme. But it’s not completely ridiculous. Just look at the epidemic of apostrophes happening now, especially on the Internet. Possibly the worst example is the use of an apostrophe to denote plurality. You see it everywhere, even in places where you’d least expect it. I frequent a forum called MobileRead. It’s populated by people who read. A lot. They love reading. They love talking about reading. They love writing about reading. And I often see sentences like, “How many book’s did you read last year?” there. I’m only slightly mollified by the fact that for many of the people there, English is not their first language. That only means that we’re starting them off on the wrong foot.

remedys
In my own town there’s a drug store called “Remedy’s.” So far I haven’t met the proprietor, Mr Remedy. I suspect he resented English class in school.

Here are a couple of links to the Quick and Dirty Tips website. One on the history of the apostrophe, and the other on when to use an apostrophe. Spoiler alert: the history of the apostrophe is not entirely rational. I wouldn’t be surprised if it eventually became okay to use it for plurals. Plural’s? In fact, the posts above have examples of where we used to use them for some plurals, but don’t now. And where we still do use them for special plurals. It’s no wonder people get confused. And some get even.

Grammar is evolving. What is correct now was not always correct. What is correct in one place is not necessarily correct everywhere. But that is no excuse for not using what is correct here and now.

March 4th is National Grammar Day (America.)

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

Does mental illness enhance creativity?

Here’s another of my pet peeves: The pop psychology link between creativity and mental illness. It is so ingrained that it is assumed to be true, and its proponents are often struck dumb when you question it. If you ask for evidence they refer to cultural phenomena. The obviousness of this artist’s unbalance, or that musician’s early death. They never refer to the thousands of artists who happily played croquet with their families on sunny afternoons. Or the many musicians who died of old age after long, successful careers. That’s not as interesting, is it?

From the BBC article:

Does mental illness enhance creativity? It’s widely held that it does – but what does the evidence say?

Everyone can cite famous people from Vincent Van Gogh and Virginia Woolf to Tony Hancock and Robin Williams, who were exceptionally creative and experienced mental health problems. There are so many examples that it seems obvious that there must be a link between mental illness and creativity.

In fact there is remarkably little good data on the topic.

One of the difficulties is that it isn’t very easy to define or measure creativity, so researchers often use proxies for it. For example, a study from 2011 simply classifies people by occupation assuming that everyone who is an artist, a photographer, a designer or a scientist must be creative, regardless of their exact job.

Did the supposed creative benefits of bipolar disorder make the writers more likely to choose their profession or did the symptoms mean it was harder for them to find a traditional job? It is hard to know.

So when the evidence is thin at best and according to some studies, lacking altogether, why has this idea stuck?

There could be many reasons why we find the idea so attractive. Maybe it reassures non-creative people, who can congratulate themselves that at least they’re not crazy. Maybe it serves as compensation for some people suffering with mental illness. At least they might be compensated with creativity. Maybe it’s just a really sexy idea that we love to perpetuate. It certainly makes for an easy cliche to use in books and movies.

Something to keep in mind:  Plenty of non-creative people have psychological problems, too.

Check out the BBC article for more.

Source: Does mental illness enhance creativity?

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment