Passive-Aggressive

Credit Paul Downey CC-BY

Credit Paul Downey CC-BY


Can anyone tell me what the pop psychology phrase “passive-aggressive” means? I see it everywhere, but everyone seems to assume that everyone knows what it means, so they don’t bother trying to explain it. I’ve tried to figure it out from context, but I don’t think I’m getting it. The closest I can come is, person A wants to get person B to do something. Person B doesn’t do it. Person A accuses them of being passive-aggressive. Apparently that’s supposed to settle things.

Oh, and I think it’s supposed to be an insult.

So, am I close? What does passive-aggressive mean?

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 10 Comments

Copyright Protection Racket

Credit Maria Elena - CC-BY

Credit Maria Elena – CC-BY

CANIPRE (pronounced canny prey,) Canadian Intellectual Property Rights Enforecment, in an undated piece, announced that in 2015 it would be protecting our copyright by tracking our Internet traffic. They will sell their services to rights holders. They managed to get the government to rewrite copyright law to support this effort. A major part of this legislation forces Internet Service Providers to pass on an Infringement Notification to whomever they say. On January 5 they announced the beginning of this program.

On January 6 Michael Geist, a University of Ottawa law professor who often blogs on copyright issues, pointed out that the blog carrying the announcement is itself probably guilty of copyright infringement. It’s in the habit of re-posting entire articles from other media outlets, including so-called exclusive content that requires payment to read. This goes well beyond the scope of fair dealing even if they hadn’t overlooked giving proper attribution to the original article.

On January 8 Geist showed us that this new Infringement Notification system is being used to intimidate people into paying protection by threatening to do them far worse harm. They back up the threat by implying that they know who the alleged infringer is, when under Canadian law they can’t, and by implying penalties that are 30 times as high as allowed in Canada. ISPs are forced to forward false information to their customers, the purpose of which is to extract money from people who have not been proven guilty of anything. Happily, ISPs are attaching clarifications to the notice, pointing out the falsehoods and standing up for their customers.

The government was warned that this would happen and they could have avoided it by clearly stating what would constitute a valid notification. They chose not to. Today, January 12, Geist wrote about how the government is now saying that they’re going to do something about it. Meanwhile, ISPs have to continue passing on false information or be fined $5000, and their customers continue to be at the mercy of this copyright protection racket.

This wouldn’t be happening if we has a rational copyright system.

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

Charlie Hebdo

jesuischarlie
The world has reacted to the recent murders in Paris in a heartening show of sympathy for the victims and support for their cause. Charlie Hebdo, according to Wikipedia, “is a French satirical weekly newspaper, featuring cartoons, reports, polemics, and jokes. Irreverent and stridently non-conformist in tone, the publication describes itself as strongly anti-racist and left-wing, publishing articles on the extreme right, Catholicism, Islam, Judaism, politics, culture, etc.” Naturally, it has been the target of criticism. You can’t twit powerful people and expect anything else. It has also been the victim of violent attacks, including the one on January 7 of this year, which killed twelve people and injured another eleven. This attack was an attempt at censorship through terror.

jesus-and-mo-charlie-hebdo-2015-01-08
jesuischarlie1
As I’ve said elsewhere, humor and satire can be useful when dealing with people who take themselves too seriously. Ridicule can be a good weapon against people who would kill for an idea. Thugs who want people to fear them lose their power when we laugh at them. Je suis Charlie. Among the many others who have spoken out are the web comic Jesus and Mo, and the scruffy band of vigilantes calling itself Anonymous. Along with Charlie Hebdo, these two are normally scorned and demonized for their anti-establishment activities. That will probably ease up for a while, as the establishment focuses on another demon.

Let’s grieve for the victims of this mass murder. Let’s also grieve for the fools who did it, victims in their own way. Most of all, let us stand together against all violence and all censorship. This particular band of thugs isn’t the only one that wants to silence their critics. Some of the very people who condemn them now are working tirelessly to silence their own. I extend praise and gratitude for those heroes who are standing up for us all.

Merci, Charlie Hebdo.

rjb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 2 Comments