More Than 170+

I saw this as I was watching the news. It was the little bit of text that sits at the bottom of the screen and tells you what the story is about. In this case it was about the number of wildfires burning in our jurisdiction as we entered summer and the heart of wildfire season.

I can understand why someone would like to use a plus sign to show that they’re talking about a number greater than the one shown. You pick a round number to show where you are, then use the plus sign to indicate that the real number is between the one shown and the next higher round number. It’s also useful when one doesn’t want to put in an exact number for whatever reason. The plus sign is handy when you don’t want to say “more than.” When you’re texting on your phone, who wants to type “more than” when they can simply hit the plus sign? From there it slipped into speech as well.

The reason this caught my eye is the redundancy. It is essentially saying, “More than more than 170.” Why would anyone say that?

rjb

About arjaybe

Jim has fought forest fires and controlled traffic in the air and on the sea. Now he writes stories.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to More Than 170+

  1. You are on point with this observation, Jim.

    And, also remember, too, that such things are commonplace in our beloved, quirky language.

    Keep these posts coming. Thanks.

  2. Laird Smith says:

    That is like each and every, or 24/7 / 365, or 110 percent. All laughable!

Please let us know what you think. No registration required.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.