People ask why I use human referents in my stories about aliens. Why, for instance, did Archie take the name Archimedes when his history doesn’t include Archimedes? Shouldn’t Archie have named himself after a great mathematician from his own world? The answer is, he did, and I’ve substituted that alien name with one we recognize immediately. I have communicated why he chose the name without having to write an explanation of his history into the story. I have saved the reader a lot of reading, and myself a lot of writing, if only we agree to imagine the alien equivalent when we see a human referent.
Rather than thinking of these stories as translations of alien texts, I think of them as whole-text transliterations, where I present the human equivalent and not the raw result. So, if you will agree with me to use this shorthand, we will save ourselves both a lot of work.
rjb
Discover more from Green Comet
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
We have too much time on our hands when people ask an author why he did such n such. I hope your explanation satisfies the detailed readership. Maybe that required explanation was fostered by a book club?
In one case it was mentioned in a review, like, it’s a great story but look what he’s done, silly boy. I knew when I was doing it that it might be a problem, but I always figured I’d have the chance to explain.
In another case Robert Schaechter, who turned the trilogy into a PDF omnibus, (https://greencomet.org/2018/02/23/dunyazad-digital-library/) asked me about it in an email exchange.